Broken Windows

Broken windows is based on a hypothesis firstlyly introduced by James Q. Wilson and George L. Kelling in 1982 called Broken Windows. The article first appeared in a March edition of Atlanta Monthly, essentially stating that identifying problem areas and repairing them early enough will prevent verbalise problems from escalating into more serious abomination. (Wilson and Kelling, 1982)
Wilson and Kelling pointed out that neighborhoods with worn, unkempt buildings, graffiti, and yes, broken windows, sends the nub that the neighborhood is un elevator cared for, and thus delinquents and deviants can run rampant without precaution of reprisal or arrest. In short, indifference leads to urban decay. Law stable citizens will hide, afraid to leave their homes, feeling vulnerable to crime and abandoned by their police department. In this type of unbiased environment, crime can only thrive.
Philip Zimbardo, a noted Stanford psychologist, conducted a relatively well-known experiment in 1969 to test the theory of broken windows. Zimbardo put one car in a somewhat run-down area in the Bronx, and another in an affluent neighborhood in Palo Alto, California.



Both vehicles were of similar refer and model, with their license plates removed and the hoods left open. Within three days, the car in the Bronx had been almost completely stripped of everything of value and vandalized beyond recognition. Meanwhile, the Palo Alto car sat unmolested for well over a week. Finally, Zimbardo smashed in the front windshield with a sledgehammer. Observers, who by all accounts appeared to be respectable, affluent members of the community, soon fall in in. within hours, the car was left just as destruct as the car left in the Bronx neighborhood (Zimbardo, 1969). The butt for preventing street crimes is to prevent the first window from getting broken.If you call for to get a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay



If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .