After studying Arthur Millers play, The Crucible, I gravel come to the conclusion that the ternary plurality most to blame for the witch hysteria and the ensuant death of unprejudiced muckle atomic number 18 Reverend Parris, Abigail, and Danforth. from individually one of these people, in some way caused harm to blameless people, and I will, in this move explain what these people, knowingly or unwittingly did contribute to the death of the innocent people hanged as witches in capital of Oregon Village in 1692.
Reverend Parris was most responsible for the Salem Witch hysteria. Reverend Parris was spying on Abigail when he saw the girls terpsichore in the forest in the middle of the night. He told Abigail that this would harm is position in the town and that she must do something about this. So Abigail went and accused the other women of witchcraft first with Tituba. In addition, during the trials Reverend Parris took every attempt to end the address with the truth, such as Proctor attempted too, he would roar it an attack on the hook. He would not let the court hear the truth that could set innocent people spare and also establish that Abigail was in fact dancing in the woods out of her own free will. Reverend Parris in covering up his houses name led to many innocent deaths.
Abigail was also responsible for the tragedy. She had many options in ways she could have explained the dancing in the woods. In the end she decided to cultivate the accusation of witchcraft on the people she didnt like. She decided her own(prenominal) interests were to a greater extent important than the other peoples innocent lives. Another causa she is to blame is because she didnt rest with the accusation against the person. In court she would take chances that they were strangulation her...
It is sometimes better to get your opinion in by writing in the third person. That way people do not automatically take the offensive.
The fact is nonentity wants to hear I mean but are more responsive to the author thinks.....just a suggestion.
One of the rules about writing an informative essay is that no one cares what you (the author) thinks. What Im saying is that you shoud not wrtie I think because you are simply stating your opinion, which no one in reality cares about. I do agree with the last comment, there could be some more information, however, this essay was pretty succint. The author presented his/her ideas in a clear style, and no confusion was present. Not with child(p)!
Your essay effectively supported your thesis; however, details were missing. peradventure you could add more details pertaining to the hithertots you laid out in the essay? I wish you further improvement as you continue in your efforts to produce enviable literary works.
They show insight and interest in the subjects. However they have to be backed up by proof, like other belles-lettres or somebodies theory, etc...
It is true that you should never write I think or anything containing the first person, but you fag end write it can be argued or as the research showed, etc... For the rest the essay was short, but decent :)
Is the play i direct trace of what actually happened in Salem in 1692? The author needfully to make it clear that you are annalysing just a peice of literature not an actual event in history, or if you are back it up with actual historical background. Your analysing characters in a play, although real, your analysing their actions through a still fictional peice of work, statments like These people are responsible for the deaths of innocent poelpe in 1692make readers a stain unsure.
As the others have commented, first person pronouns shouldnt be used in an essay. In the sentence ...he would believe that the accused persons spirits was choking the girls..., if persons is plural the verb should be were, if persons is singular it shoud be persons spirit was. more(prenominal) details would be great (maybe more than one dissever per person with reasons why they did things or more on what they did). generally you did a good job.
Overall, it is a nicely structured study but it lacks a lot of evidence for why each of the three characters were most to blame for the witch trials. Each divide is rather short. It could use expanding
I think you could add more information..like why they were dancing in the forest...or why her position would be harmed...or even what her position was...and I really want to know how she was dancing with??? Was it a friend or what???
If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.
0 comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.